
- Modelio multiple projects pdf#
- Modelio multiple projects software#
- Modelio multiple projects series#
Modelio multiple projects pdf#
Some PDF files, XML files related to tests (but without clear identification on how they were produced) and videos showing the usage of the tool for modeling or interchange which are most of the time missing, except for Modelio. The level of information provided for each tool is not exactly the same. But it is not always explicitely mentionned.
Modelio multiple projects software#
versioned software product with eventually versioned complementary modules (e.g for Modelio). Also, it is important to consider that tests are performed for given configurations, i.e.

They are those in the following screen capture. For each certified tools which are commercial ones, a set of documents are provided with test data set, and sometimes videos giving evidence that the tested tools supports compliance requirements. Let's consider that some requirements are optional, in particular for customization of the language by mean of stereotypes. It proposes a process, a set of requirements for conformance, generic tools certification documents and a link to a test directory accessible only to members. In addition, the Open Group proposes some certification of the tool implementing ArchiMate, as described here. Business Management Systems, Product Management Systems, etc.) realized with heterogeneous products. In addition, providing the Open Group ArchiMate Model Exchange (I will call it Open Format for ArchiMate in the rest of the article), which relies on an XML and standardized XML schemas, should support model/information interchange between ArchiMate modeling applications and Enterprise Digital Assets Repositories (e.g. When considering that one motivation for ArchiMate was to provide a common simple language allowing different kind of architects and stakeholders to communicate together, reflecting their respective viewpoints in order to be aligned on the same business objectives, Open Group started to address the needs for interoperability at Business level first, by improving communication within the enterprise for better cooperation.įor this, providing a formal description of a simple language shared between concerned stakeholders (several kind of architects, operational managers, etc.) was the way to deal with interoperability at semantic and information level. Part 1- How Open Group addresses Interoperability The conclusion opens perspective on strategy to adopt for Enterprise Architects: ensuring Interoperability isn't a long quiet river.

What do we learn from exchange format schemas study?ĭon't hesitate sharing you comments, knowledge, viewpoints and experience/best practices on the topic.From models to linked data using semantic web technologies?.Potential issues illustrated with practical cases with Archi, EA, Modelio (this article).
Modelio multiple projects series#
This is the first article of a series about ArchiMate Interoperability, which includes:
